Archive

January 20th, 2017

The Real Danger of Trump’s Alleged ‘Pee Party’

    The week leading up to the presidential inauguration brought streams, if not floods, of pee jokes. You might even say it was the number one opportunity for scatological humor since the poop cruise of 2013.

    My heart goes out to parents who have to find an appropriate way to explain this to their children.

    The occasion for the pee jokes was a leaked, unverified report on Russian anti-Trump intelligence. Someone described as a former British intelligence agent claims the Russians have been cultivating Trump for years, in part by gathering compromising information on him to hold over his head.

    In one especially lurid example, the source claims, Trump allegedly paid sex workers to engage in lewd urination-related acts in a Moscow hotel known “to have microphones and cameras in all the main rooms.”

    For those who support Trump, it’s a heinous and untrue case of scurrilous journalism. For those who oppose Trump, it’s an opportunity to laugh at him. And laugh and laugh and laugh.

Some Democrats are criticizing John Lewis's 'legitimate' jab at Trump. That means it worked.

    The last Martin Luther King Jr. Day before America's first black president handed power over to Donald Trump was always going to be awkward. Rep. John Lewis, D-Georgia, determined just how awkward it would be when he told Chuck Todd of "Meet the Press" that he did not see Trump as a "legitimate president."

    No one needs a refresher on how Donald Trump responded, with an insult to the city of Atlanta, but some might have missed the pushback in mainstream and conservative media. Byron York, the Washington Examiner's chief political correspondent, saw a "dilemma" emerging for Democrats who could not agree with Lewis, with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, calling the "not legitimate" charge "nonproductive," White House chief of staff Denis McDonough calling Trump "freely elected" and Sen. Bernie Sanders I-Vermont, calling the insult "just words."

    York's analysis:

Inaugurations past and present

    Today's inauguration of Donald Trump as our 45th president will be the 16th I've witnessed in Washington, in person or via television, going back to Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1957. All have been confirmations of the marvel of continuity in the transition of national power.

    I remember that Ike's assumption of his second term, not surprisingly, came amid relative calm here after his second landslide victory over Adlai Stevenson. The World War II hero and smiling icon basked in the public adoration as he and Mamie rode down Independence Avenue from the Capitol to the White House they had already been calling home for four years.

    In 1961, when young and handsome John F. Kennedy, in a top hat, covered the same route with glamourous Jackie, near-delirium reigned despite a fierce overnight snowstorm. It required the shoveling services of numerous military units from nearby bases to clear the path for them and the inaugural parade that followed.

I think I need a new religion

    And so the Boy President heads for Washington to be sworn into office, pumping his fist, mooning the media, giving the stinky finger to whomever irks him, doing his end zone dance, promising to build the wall, cut taxes, create jobs, provide great health insurance for EVERYONE, send his son-in-law to the Middle East to solve that little problem, and the rest of us will sit in a barn and keep ourselves warm and hide our heads under our wings, poor things. Discouraging.

    So I've been shopping around for a new religion to see me through the next four years. Too many of my fellow Christians voted for selfishness and for degradation of the beautiful world God created. I guess they figured that by the time the planet is a smoky wasteland, they'd be nice and comfy in heaven, so wotthehell. Anyhow, I'm looking around for other options.

The empty Trump administration will struggle

    We're two days away from having a new president. But we're apparently a lot longer than that from having a Trump administration with even a minimally functional ability to govern.

    Politico's Michael Crowley has a nice piece explaining the missing National Security Council staffers, and the dangers that could cause if there's an early crisis. Hundreds of briefing papers have been created by Obama's NSC and sent to Team Trump, but the New York Times reports that no one knows if they've been reviewed.

    Yet the NSC is ahead of the curve for this administration. Look at the big four departments. There's no Trump appointee for any of the top State Department jobs below secretary nominee Rex Tillerson. No Trump appointee for any of the top Department of Defense jobs below retired general James Mattis. Treasury? Same story. Justice? It is one of two departments (along with, bizarrely, Commerce) where Trump has selected a deputy secretary. But no solicitor general, no one at civil rights, no one in the civil division, no one for the national security division.

Show Rep. Lewis some respect, Mr. Trump

    Donald Trump took to Twitter -- surprise! -- on Saturday to slam Rep. John Lewis, D-Georgia, for saying that he planned to skip Trump's upcoming inauguration because he doesn't consider Trump to be a "legitimate president."

    However ill-considered Trump felt Lewis's comments to be, the president-elect might have done well to avoid hitting back on this particular weekend. Lewis is an icon of the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr. Day is Monday, and Lewis famously marched with King into Selma, Alabama, in 1965 -- enduring a brutal police beating and a cracked skull along the way.

    Instead, of course, Trump tweeted that Lewis "should spend more time on fixing and helping his district, which is in horrible shape and is falling apart (not to mention crime infested) rather than falsely complaining about the election results." After a breather -- and a wave of social media criticism of his remarks -- Trump jumped back into the ring several hours later, tweeting that "John Lewis should focus on the burning and crime infested inner-cities of the U.S."

Inauguration Consternation

    Why is this inauguration different from any other?

    Let's start with the fact that most Americans are not happy that Donald Trump is about to become president. The Washington Post/ABC News poll this week found that Trump enters the Oval Office with the lowest favorable ratings since the question has been asked. Only 40 percent view Trump favorably. That compares with 62 percent for George W. Bush as he entered office in 2001 and 79 percent for Barack Obama in 2009.

    In the past, presidents facing public doubts of the sort Trump confronts have practiced what you might call self-interested humility. Bush declined to acknowledge the anger so many felt at the time about how the Supreme Court had paved the way to his presidency, but in his well-wrought inaugural address he did show how to reach out and reassure those who worried about what he might do with power.

    "Civility is not a tactic or a sentiment," Bush declared. "It is the determined choice of trust over cynicism, of community over chaos."

Call it payback for that birther business, Mr. Trump

    If you're going to play the victim, make sure you're really victimized.

    That's the lesson that I hope conservative CNN commentator and radio host Ben Ferguson learned after criticizing Rep. John Lewis for describing Donald Trump as an "illegitimate president."

    Ferguson said it was "unprecedented" for the Georgia Democrat and civil rights icon to challenge Trump's legitimacy. "I can't imagine the fallout, the backfire that you would have if a Republican ever implied that about Barack Obama or Bill Clinton or JFK or anyone else for that matter," Ferguson said.

    Ah, how soon we forget.

    "Ben, Ben, Ben, that's exactly what many Republicans did," CNN host Poppy Harlow interrupted, "including the president-elect for years questioning the legitimacy of the first black president."

Inauguration under a shadow

    On the eve of Donald Trump's swearing-in as the 45th American president, there is nothing to stop it despite public dissent, such as Democratic Congressman John Lewis's contention that Trump will be not be a "legitimate" president.

    Those many voters who cling to the Georgia civil-rights icon's view have come up with no way to give teeth to their lament. Trump has dismissed with the back of his hand the judgment of ethics arbiters that his plan to turn over his real estate empire to his two eldest sons still violates conflict-of-interest standards, which dictate a clean blind-trust arrangement.

    Departing President Obama from the start has promised to do his utmost to assure the same smooth transfer of power that his own Republican predecessor afforded him in 2009. Even so, Trump's incoming White House chief of staff Reince Priebus has called on Obama to "step up" by refuting Lewis's comment and rebuking his plan to skip Trump's swearing-in.

No shiny shoes at this inaugural ball

    Looking around the ballroom, the first thing you notice is the lack of regalia -- no tuxes, no flowing gowns, no shiny footwear, no clinking jewels.

    Nor should there be, for this is the Inaugural Consolation Ball for the people of Not Trump Nation.

    There is nothing to celebrate for them – for us -- when into the Oval Office strides meanness and venality in the place of grace and dignity.

    It’s bad. But some things about the Inaugural Consolation Ball are quite heartening.

    One thing is how many people are there -- nearly 65.8 million, the number who voted for Hillary Clinton (contrasted with the winning 62.9 million for you-know-who).

    And something about all those not-Trump voters:

    A whole bunch weren’t interested in dancing when the inauguration rolled around. They were interested in marching – hundreds of thousands in Washington, D.C., hundreds of thousands in the nation’s capitals, hundreds of thousands overseas.