Archive

December 21st

Trump can't wait to sell out his base

    "Watch what we do, not what we say."

    At the beginning of Richard Nixon's presidency, that's how Attorney General John Mitchell explained the way reporters could best understand what the country was about to experience.

    It's also good advice for understanding the administration of the billionaire phony populist who will assume the presidency next month. Donald Trump cast himself as the champion of a besieged American working class and a defender of its interests. His early decisions tell us something very different: This could be the most anti-worker, anti-union crowd to run our government since the Gilded Age.

    There's an irony here, since Mitchell was trying to reassure journalists that despite Nixon's 1968 law-and-order campaign, he would stay true to enforcing civil rights laws. In Trump's case, we're learning that rhetoric out of labor songbooks meant less than nothing. He was covering up an agenda focused on undercutting legal protections for workers and weakening their already beleaguered organizations.

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

Trumping the Environment

    Whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump was elected, the environment is going to suffer.

    Both have supported horizontal fracking, the destruction of the earth to extract oil and gas. The use of fracking is so harmful to the environment and public health that numerous banks refuse to lend funds to individuals who wish to build or sell their houses near drilling operations. Numerous lenders have also refused to loan money to corporations that wish to drill.

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

Make Colleges Diverse

    Many college campuses have reacted to Donald Trump’s election with shock and angst. Professors and students are wondering how the rest of the country could be so different from them. The more introspective are asking: What can we do?

    Michael Bloomberg has an answer.

    It’s an answer that should appeal to both liberals and conservatives — an answer that isn’t about Trump per se but instead about the alienation that helped him win. Bloomberg wants to make leading colleges more open to the working class. He wants to make them fairer places that look more like America.

    Top colleges are already diverse in some ways, of course. They enroll students of every ethnicity, from around the world. Yet those otherwise diverse student bodies remain distressingly affluent. Worst of all, they remain affluent even though many poor and middle-class students could thrive at top colleges.

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

If nothing is true, then everything can be false

    After post-truth comes all-fake.

    The election of Donald Trump has seen the flowering of the post-truth landscape. Emotion outranks fact; believing makes it so. We are all Tinker Bell now. Clap if you believe in voter fraud. Clap if you doubt a human role in climate change.

    So when the president-elect claims, with no basis in reality, that he would have won the popular vote "if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally," the customary burden of proof is flipped: Where, his minions ask, with no hint of embarrassment, is the evidence that the assertion is untrue?

    "I don't know that that is a false statement, George, and neither do you," vice president elect Mike Pence told George Stephanopoulos said on ABC's "This Week." Incoming White House chief of staff Reince Priebus took a similar true-until-proven-otherwise stance toward Trump's outlandish assertion: "I don't know if that's not true."

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

I'm Mike Pence. No, not that one.

    "Mike Pence is in the house!" my longtime friend Jeff declared last weekend when I stepped into his new microbrewery. This was met with a chorus of groans and chuckles from the bar. "How are things going?" he asked. "Oh, you know," I played along halfheartedly, knowing that most everyone else still thinks this is funny. "I'm just messing everything up as quickly as possible."

    I am not, of course, Mike Pence, the governor of Indiana and now our vice president-elect, God help us all. If anything, I am in many ways the opposite of the governor: a progressive atheist software developer who, having been raised a Jehovah's Witness, has a healthy aversion to Orwellian thought-control cults of any political or religious origin.

    It's been a tough year to be Mike Pence. Not that I have ever had a strong affinity for my name as a unique identifier, having been raised, like the VP-elect's son, as a Mike Pence Jr., and never having had a strong reaction to the always-raised "Mike or Michael?" question. But sometimes you don't value a thing until you have lost it, and when people suddenly associate your name with someone you personally find to be a monster.

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

Five facts about Trump's 'popularity'

    Donald Trump won the election. That's a fact. But since then, Trump, his supporters and even some pundits are making various claims about his victory that aren't true, starting with his Orwellian assertions to have won in a landslide or even recording "one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history."

    Here are a few other real facts about the president-elect, the election and public opinion.

 

    1. With almost all ballots finally counted, Hillary Clinton won the "popular" vote -- that is, the total number of votes cast -- by more than 2.8 million, about a 2.1 percent edge over Trump's tally. This is a larger gap than the one in the 2000 election, when Al Gore won about a half-million votes more than George W. Bush did. John Kennedy in 1960, Richard Nixon in 1968 and Jimmy Carter in 1976 were each elected president with a smaller percentage lead in total votes cast than Clinton's lead over Trump. In 2004, Bush beat John Kerry by only 2.5 percent of the vote.

    No, winning the popular vote doesn't have any legal standing at all. We shouldn't pretend otherwise. But it does mean that claiming the voters were demanding Trump or the programs he favored is dubious at best.

 

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

Embracing humanism may be the only way forward

    This year was in many ways one of great-power politics. The resurgence of Russia on the global stage, from Ukraine to Syria to China. The Saudi-Iranian power struggle in the Middle East. China's assertion of its status as the Middle Kingdom once again, expecting deference from its neighbors in East and Southeast Asia. North Korea's determined pursuit of nuclear weapons. Even Great Britain's rejection of the European Union, fueled in part by Tory dreams of Britannia sovereign once again. It is a world of deals and shifting alliances, particularly as Pax Americana seems to wane - a trend that Donald Trump's stunning election as president threatens to accelerate - and U.S. foreign policy takes a decidedly realist turn.

    It is a world of 21 million refugees and 41 million internally displaced people, driven from their homes by war, famine, and tyranny; a world in which a half-million Syrians have been slaughtered in front of our eyes; a world with a conscience that can no longer be shocked by human suffering, whether from poison gas, barrel bombs, deliberate and systematic rape, or looming genocide. How, then, can one argue that this was a year of humanism?

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

The Tainted Election

    The CIA, according to The Washington Post, has now determined that hackers working for the Russian government worked to tilt the 2016 election to Donald Trump. This has actually been obvious for months, but the agency was reluctant to state that conclusion before the election out of fear that it would be seen as taking a political role.

    Meanwhile, the FBI went public 10 days before the election, dominating headlines and TV coverage across the country with a letter strongly implying that it might be about to find damning new evidence against Hillary Clinton — when it turned out, literally, to have found nothing at all.

    Did the combination of Russian and FBI intervention swing the election? Yes. Clinton lost three states — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania — by less than a percentage point, and Florida by only slightly more. If she had won any three of those states, she would be president-elect. Is there any reasonable doubt that Putin/Comey made the difference?

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

Patriotic Opposition to Donald Trump

    Nothing is safe or sacrosanct in Donald Trump’s developing governance team, and America had better start being alarmed about it and moving to actively oppose it.

    The time for voting has elapsed, but the time for being vocal has emerged.

    Let’s take the tally:

    He has chosen a man hostile to immigrants and with a complicated — to put it mildly — history on race to be attorney general.

    He has chosen a man who is anti-abortion, pro-fetal “personhood,” and anti-Obamacare to be secretary of health and human services.

    He has chosen a man who has criticized paid sick-leave policies and opposes increasing the federal minimum wage to lead the Department of Labor.

    He has chosen a climate change denier and anti-environmental-regulation crusader to lead the Environmental Protection Agency.

    He has chosen a vocal proponent of school vouchers to run the Department of Education.

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!

December 20th

The Electoral College's Trump dilemma

    In making what is likely to be the most consequential decision of this transition period, Donald Trump couldn't resist petty vindictiveness.

    Mitt Romney was briefly touted as the front-runner to become secretary of state. After meeting with Trump over a meal, he pronounced himself "very impressed" by the man he had described as "a phony, a fraud" during the campaign.

    Trump did not accept this graciously. Citing a Trump friend, The Washington Post reported that the president-elect "enjoyed watching his dinner partner appear to grovel for the post."

    Memo to Trump's Republican critics: Your initial instincts about Trump were right. Remember that catering to this man will bring only pain and humiliation.

Full text and e-editions are available to premium subscribers only. To subscribe to the digital edition, please visit subscription page. If you are already a subscriber, please login to the site.

We'd be happy to set up login information for a free week of the Liberal Opinion Week website for you. Please email liberal@iowaconnect.com with your request. Thanks for your interest in the Liberal!